I'm giving a bad score because of sound.
If you have bad sound fucking fix it, don't expect us to give you a high score anyway.
I'm giving a bad score because of sound.
If you have bad sound fucking fix it, don't expect us to give you a high score anyway.
"Bored artist" is not a sufficient title.
More like unimaginative artist. Put more effort into it next time.
This flash is unacceptable.
There is no structure, drawing, or animation of interest that I can make out. Also, there is no sound save for the introduction, which relies too heavily on filters to "dazzle" the audience.
wao
That was actually pretty funny. I liked the funny monkey :D
I loved it
I love the music that goes with it.
æææææ»æææææ»æææææ»
dat wuz gr8
But no review crew pick 4 U.
I don't know why, but that made me chuckle in the way I'm supposed to chuckle. But it also left me wondering where you got someone to sing "dick lol" over and over again.
lmao
wow.
Next time, don't tween so much. Your animation needs a lot to be worked on, but it was good enough. The idea was good, I laughed at the idea of a scientist and a priest duking it out.
But the most impressive thing was the choice of music, now all you have to do is match the pace of the animation to it.
Great lip-synching and voice acting.
The animation and the background seemed pretty sparse, but I loved the voice acting. It reminded me of Family Guy, without the random flashbacks.
It wasn't very innovative, but you get extra points for effort and animation.
3/5.
Age 35, Male
Seattle, WA
Joined on 12/2/05